Identifying and Prioritizing the Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Dimensions of Port Cities and Its Role in Urban Management (Case Study: Khuzestan Port Cities)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Phd entrepreneurship & Expert PMO

2 Assistant Professor of Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran

Abstract

Port cities are seen as an important link in the country's logistics chain. So that the national economy and foreign trade of the country is completely dependent on the functioning of the country's trading ports. The main purpose of this study was to identify and prioritize effective dimensions of entrepreneurship ecosystem in Iranian port cities (a case study of Khuzestan port cities). This research is a qualitative research and the method is the case study and how to collect semi-structured in-depth interviews with experts. The statistical population is maritime transport industry experts and purposeful sampling method. The method of analyzing the data from the interviews was coded the result of this coding was done in eight dimensions and 84 indicators. Experts' validity and reliability of documenting the whole process were documented by several researchers. In the end, prioritizing the effective dimensions in the entrepreneurship ecosystem of ports was done using a hierarchical analysis process based on pairwise comparisons technique. The results showed that the most effective dimensions in the entrepreneurship ecosystem of Iran's port cities are: policy, finance, markets, stakeholders, human capital, support, natural capital and culture, all of which coincide with the systematic approach to all dimensions promote balanced and sustainable entrepreneurship development in port cities management.
 

Keywords


 
Alice Mah, (2014)  “Port Cities and Global Legacies”, University of Warwick, UK.
Amolo J., Stephen O. Migiro (South Africa). (2015), “An Entrepreneurial flair development: the role of an ecosystem”.
Aspen Network of Development Entrepreneurs (ANDE). (2013), “Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Diagnostic Tools”.    
Audretsch D. B., Belitski M. (2016), “Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: establishing the framework conditions”, The Journal of Technology Transfer , 1-22.
Cohen, B. (2006), “Sustainable Valley Entrepreneurial Ecosystems”, Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(1): 1- 14
Edmundo I, Erkko A, Cristiano M,Fernando A, Gimenez  E, Eduardo A. (2016), “Analysis of the  Brazilian Entrepreneurial Ecosystem ”, Desenvolvimento em Questão
Mack E, Mayer H. (2016), “The evolutionary dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems”, Urban Studies 2016, Vol. 53(10) 2118–2133.
 Manimala M.J, Thomas P, Thomas P.K. (2015), “Perception of Entrepreneurial Ecosystem in India: Influence of Industrial Versus Personal Context of Entrepreneurs”, Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
Martínez J M, Ivars J V, López S. (2017), “Structure, Effects and Deficiencies of an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: the Spanish Case”, Journal of Business ISSN 2078‐9424
McGill, R, (1998), “Urban Management in Development Countries”, Cities, Vol 15, No 6.
Michael N. Pearson, (1998), “Port Cities and Intruders”, The Johns Hopkins University Press .
Morris M H., Shirokova G., Tsukanova T. (2017), “Student entrepreneurship and the university ecosystem: a multi-country empirical exploration”, European J. International Management, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2017 
Nombela G. and Trujillo L. (2010). Privatization and Regulation of the Seaport Industry. Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (Spain). Mimeo. 
Wiegmans, B. W., & Louw, E. (2011) “Changing port–city relations at Amsterdam: A new phase at the interface?”  Journal of Transport Geography, Vol.19, No.4, pp. 575-583
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Making a Difference for Entrepreneurs, Report of world bank 2018, Doing business, www.doingbusiness.org