نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکترای سیاستگذاری عمومی، گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، تبریز، ایران.
2 دانشیار، گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، تبریز، ایران.
3 استادیار، گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، واحد بناب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، بناب، ایران.
4 استادیار، گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، تبریز، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Introduction and purpose: The present research was conducted with the aim of investigating the process of public policy in the field of urban economy in Iran based on the naming of years by the Supreme Leader.
Research method: The current research is practical in terms of purpose and was conducted with the help of multifaceted foundation data theory qualitative method and through semi-structured interviews with 13 experts who were selected by theoretical sampling.
Findings: In the findings section, attention was paid to 5 main sections: 1- the most important economic components emphasized in naming the years, 2- the perception of the interviewees about the category of naming the years, 3- examining the impact of the name Placing years on the policy-making process of the three forces, 4- Economic factors and obstacles affecting the non-implementation of policies based on naming years and 5- Economy and urban economy: the focus of naming years in the last decade by the leader of the revolution
Conclusion: Based on the text of the interviews, the urban economy categories mentioned by the interviewees can be classified into 3 categories, i.e. resistance economy, support for domestic production, employment creation. The interviewees' perception of the category of naming the years includes ideal-oriented, judgment-oriented, policy-oriented, stereotype-oriented, expediency-oriented, jurist-oriented. The results showed that among the legislature, executive and judiciary, from the point of view of individuals, the government and then the judiciary played the most important role. Most of the interviewees stated that the government had this possibility and was able to establish or facilitate economic policies such as resistance economy policy, job creation, support for national production in the country, but in some cases it was not carried out in the desired way. It has not been successful.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)